top of page
Keeping Wildlife Wild website banner titled “What Does the Science Say?” featuring three elephants walking across a grassy landscape with mountains in the background. A DNA double helix symbolizes scientific research and evidence-based wildlife conservation and animal welfare.

LOOKING BEYOND THE CLAIMS
Wildlife conservation and animal welfare are often discussed through tradition, personal experience and deeply held beliefs. But what happens when we look beyond the claims and examine the evidence?
What Does the Science Say? explores peer-reviewed research and scientific literature addressing the lives of wild animals—in captivity and in the wild.
From animal welfare, behavior and cognition to conservation, human-animal interactions and the effects of captivity, each article takes a closer look at what researchers have discovered, what questions remain unanswered, and what the evidence can—and cannot—tell us.
Because meaningful conversations about wildlife should begin with evidence.

EXPLORE THE RESEARCH

Scientific evidence, explained and placed in context.

› When the Conservation Claim Outruns the Evidence

Ambassador animals, captive breeding and the gap between a memorable encounter and demonstrated conservation

 

› Animal–Visitor Interactions:
Where Do We Go from Here?

A September 2026 scientific commentary identifies important gaps in research on animal–visitor interactions. 

​

› The Ambassador Animal Business​

ZAA accredited Tanganyika Park's viral hippo story—and what its cited research actually establishes

​

› Individuals Matter

When Zoos Speak of Saving Species,

What About Each Animal?

​

› Supporting Animal Protection Is Only The Beginning

A U.S. Survey Reveals Gaps in Knowledge of Exotic-Pet Rules

​

› Whose Experience Matters?

What Research Reveals About Animals, Tourists and Ethical Wildlife Encounters

› “Scales Of Engagement”

AZA Connect article reports that moving reptiles held visitors’ attention longer than stationary presentations. But attention, education, empathy and conservation are not interchangeable outcomes.

​

› When Conservation Becomes A Flexible Label

What actually determines which animals zoos keep—and when does maintaining them become wildlife conservation?

 

› The Legal Philosophy Behind Zoos Confinement of Animals

​

› Program animal welfare:

A scoping review of animal interaction programs

and their welfare impact on zoo-housed animals.


› Do Ambassador Animals Actually

Improve Conservation Learning?

​

› When Is Captivity For Conservation Justified?

Posted August 2026

› Conservation or Collection?
What Determines Which Animals Live at the Zoo?

A new study offers a revealing look at conservation, collection planning and visitor appeal.

 

› Zoo Interaction Programs and Animal Welfare

A 22-Year Review Finds Significant Gaps in What Science Can Tell Us:

​

› Who Reviews What Happens At The Zoo?

When Research Involves Captive Wildlife, Who Decides What Is Ethical?

​

› What Is A Modern Zoo For?

Conservation. Education. Recreation. Entertainment. What happens when those missions collide?

​

› The moral positions taken towards zoos and conservation
Does Seeing Wildlife Really Inspire Us To Protect It?

​

› AZA Ambassador Animals

Not a Pet Until It's Part of the Show?


› Learning by Watching
The Science Behind the Messages We Send About Wildlife

​

› Education That Inspires Respect Without Sending Mixed Messages

​

› The Exotic Pet Trade – An Unnecessary Luxury
In Need Of Regulation

​

› The moral positions taken towards zoos and conservation

​

› When The Climate Changes, Can Captive Wildlife Adapt?

KeepingWildlifeWild.org footer featuring a tortoise in a natural landscape, with wildlife imagery and the organization's guiding principles: Evidence, Education, and Accountability.
bottom of page