top of page
Humane World for Animals No Pet Monkey_edited.jpg

There's No Such Thing As A "Pet Monkey"


California just defended its protections against private primate ownership. But across much of America, the larger problem remains.

A proposal could have opened the door to keeping certain primates as pets. More than 4,000 people spoke out—and California said no.

Earlier this year, a petition asked the California Fish and Game Commission to weaken the state’s longstanding restrictions and allow private individuals to keep certain primates—including marmosets, capuchins, macaques and spider monkeys—as pets.

Humane World for Animals mobilized quickly. More than 4,000 Californians responded to its action alert, organizations joined the opposition and advocates presented the animal-welfare and public-safety consequences to the commission. The petition was denied.

That decision matters because there is no meaningful way to transform a primate into a domesticated household pet.

Primates are intelligent, highly social wild animals with complex behavioral and environmental needs. As they mature, they can become stronger, territorial and difficult to control. When these arrangements fail, the consequences are borne not only by the animals and their owners, but also by neighbors, first responders, animal-control officers, veterinarians and already overburdened sanctuaries.

Humane World reports that it has documented more than 380 dangerous incidents involving privately kept primates since 1990—a number it considers a significant undercount. Those incidents reportedly resulted in 273 people injured, including 89 children, and more than 40 primates dead.

The risks extend beyond physical injury. Nonhuman primates can carry bacterial, viral, fungal and parasitic infections capable of spreading to people.

The trade also does not exist in isolation. Recent California cases have involved illegally possessed or smuggled spider monkeys discovered alongside suspected drug activity or intercepted at the border. Globally, wildlife trafficking for the pet trade adds pressure to primate populations already threatened by habitat loss and other human activity.

There is another part of this system that deserves greater scrutiny: the images and encounters that make primates appear cute, manageable and available.

Social-media videos, entertainment portrayals and attractions offering hands-on encounters or photographs with primates can blur the boundary between a wild animal and a pet. They may encourage ownership while concealing the confinement, deprivation and lifelong consequences behind the image.

California’s decision demonstrates that public engagement can make a difference. But this victory does not end the trade.

The proposed federal Captive Primate Safety Act would prohibit the private ownership of nonhuman primates as pets throughout the United States. Until meaningful protections exist nationwide, primates will continue to suffer and communities will continue to face preventable risks.

More than 4,000 people helped California hold the line. Now Congress—and every state that continues to permit this trade—must do the same.

Complete article from Humane World for Animals

bottom of page