WHEN THE WILDLIFE TRADE IS A SYSTEM — NOT JUST A SMUGGLER
Eric Goode’s Monsters of God turns the camera on the illegal reptile trade—and on the collectors, zoos, regulators and conservationists whose histories sometimes intersect.

Eric Goode has spent years documenting some of America’s most controversial relationships with captive wildlife. Tiger King examined the world of private big-cat ownership and exhibition. Chimp Crazy turned to privately held chimpanzees.
ㅤ
His latest project may be his most personally revealing.
ㅤ
In a Vanity Fair interview about the HBO documentary series Monsters of God, Goode examines the international reptile trade from an unusual position: not simply as a filmmaker or conservationist, but as someone who acknowledges that he once participated in the culture he is now scrutinizing.
ㅤ
“I was part of the problem,” Goode tells Vanity Fair. His fascination with reptiles began in childhood and eventually grew into collecting turtles, tortoises, snakes and lizards. He describes ordering reptiles through the mail from wildlife dealers, including people who would later become notorious figures in the international reptile trade. Vanity Fair
ㅤ
That history makes the larger story particularly valuable.
ㅤ
Because Monsters of God isn't simply about catching wildlife smugglers. It raises a more uncomfortable question: What happens when the demand for rare wildlife connects collectors, commercial dealers, popular culture, zoos, regulators—and even people who believe they are helping animals?

WHEN RARITY BECOMES VALUE

Wild animals can become more commercially desirable precisely because they are unusual, difficult to obtain or increasingly rare.
ㅤ
Goode describes how tighter protections for endangered wildlife made some exotic animals harder to obtain—and potentially more valuable to people willing to circumvent those protections. The documentary follows figures including reptile dealer Tommy Crutchfield and Anson Wong, who became internationally notorious for wildlife trafficking. Vanity Fair
ㅤ
Reptiles present particular trafficking challenges. Turtles, tortoises and other relatively small animals can be concealed and transported in ways that would be impossible with elephants, big cats or other large wildlife. Executive producer Jeremy McBride tells Vanity Fair that turtles and tortoises are among the animals most frequently smuggled. Vanity Fair
ㅤ
But trafficking does not exist without demand.
ㅤ
And one of the interview's most interesting observations is how that demand can be created.

WHEN POPULAR CULTURE CREATES DEMAND

Goode points to a phenomenon that reaches well beyond dedicated wildlife collectors: popular culture can change which animals people suddenly want.
ㅤ
He recalls seeing demand associated with movies and entertainment—from clownfish following Finding Nemo to owls associated with Harry Potter. The specific animals change, but the underlying mechanism is familiar: an animal becomes culturally desirable, and human demand follows. Vanity Fair
ㅤ
That deserves attention because wildlife trafficking is often presented as though it begins with the trafficker.
ㅤ
It doesn't.
ㅤ
Somewhere at the other end of the chain is someone who wants the animal.
ㅤ
That person may be a private collector seeking something rare. It may be someone entering the exotic-pet trade. It may be a commercial operation. Historically, the demand for unusual wildlife has also involved zoological institutions.
ㅤ
The important question therefore isn't only Who smuggled the animal?
ㅤ
It is also Who wanted it—and why?

THE ZOO CONNECTION DESERVES ATTENTION

One of the most important aspects of the Vanity Fair interview received little attention in our original article.
ㅤ
Goode does not describe the illegal reptile trade as a world populated exclusively by easily identifiable “bad guys.” The article explicitly discusses the historical involvement of major American zoos within the broader system explored by Monsters of God. Vanity Fair
ㅤ
Later, Goode acknowledges failures across several parts of that system—including zoos, wildlife authorities and himself. His point is not that every participant bears equal responsibility. Rather, he argues that the history is more complicated than dividing everyone neatly into heroes and villains. Vanity Fair
ㅤ
That distinction matters.
ㅤ
Wildlife trafficking is a criminal activity. Conservation is intended to protect wildlife. Zoos, government agencies, collectors and traffickers have profoundly different roles and responsibilities.
ㅤ
But examining history honestly sometimes means asking where those worlds have intersected—and whether demand for rare animals helped create incentives for people willing to obtain them illegally.

FROM COLLECTING TO CONSERVATION

Goode's own trajectory illustrates another complication.
ㅤ
His fascination with reptiles eventually led him away from collecting and toward conservation. In 2005, he founded the Turtle Conservancy, and his work now includes efforts to protect endangered turtles and tortoises. Vanity Fair
ㅤ
One example discussed in the interview is the ploughshare tortoise, a critically endangered species from Madagascar whose rarity made it extraordinarily valuable in the illegal wildlife trade.
ㅤ
After animals confiscated from smugglers came into conservation care, Goode and the Turtle Conservancy became involved in breeding the species. The organization is now participating with other groups and the Madagascar government in efforts intended ultimately to return animals to their native habitat. Vanity Fair
ㅤ
That provides an important distinction.
ㅤ
Captive breeding can mean very different things depending upon its purpose and outcome. Breeding animals to perpetuate private collections or commercial exhibition is not equivalent to breeding endangered wildlife as part of a program intended to restore animals to the wild.
ㅤ
The word “conservation” alone does not tell us which one is occurring.

CAN LOVING WILDLIFE ALSO CONTRIBUTE TO ITS CAPTIVITY?

Perhaps the most thought-provoking part of the interview comes when Goode turns the question back on himself.
ㅤ
He still keeps tortoises. He believes he provides them with good lives. But rather than treating that belief as proof, he questions his own assumptions.
ㅤ
Goode acknowledges that the animals he keeps would ultimately be better off living in the wild. Vanity Fair
ㅤ
That is an unusually important admission because it exposes a tension at the center of many debates about captive wildlife.
ㅤ
People who keep wild animals do not necessarily dislike them.
ㅤ
Quite often, the opposite is true.
ㅤ
Fascination can become collecting. Collecting can create demand. Demand can create commercial value. And when an animal becomes valuable enough, someone somewhere may have an incentive to acquire it—legally or illegally.
ㅤ
The question therefore cannot simply be whether an owner loves an animal.
ㅤ
We also have to ask whether our desire to possess, display or interact with wildlife serves the animal—or primarily serves us.

THE LEGAL AND ILLEGAL TRADES DO NOT ALWAYS EXIST IN SEPARATE WORLDS

This may be the most useful broader lesson from Monsters of God.
ㅤ
We often imagine wildlife commerce as two clearly separated systems: a legitimate legal trade on one side and criminal trafficking on the other.
ㅤ
Reality can be considerably more complicated.
ㅤ
Animals move through international supply chains. Documentation matters. Species protections differ between countries. Captive-bred and wild-caught animals may enter commerce under different rules. And once wildlife enters a commercial system, determining its true origin can become critically important.
ㅤ
That is why enforcement, traceability and transparency matter.
ㅤ
A wild animal offered legally for sale is not necessarily evidence that every step preceding that sale was lawful.

THE BIGGER QUESTION

Eric Goode's story is compelling because he does not position himself entirely outside the world he investigates.
ㅤ
He was fascinated by reptiles. He collected them. He bought animals from dealers. He later became a conservationist. And now he is using the access and understanding gained from that history to examine a trade whose consequences extend around the world.
ㅤ
Perhaps that is why Monsters of God offers an opportunity to move beyond the personalities involved.
ㅤ
Wildlife trafficking is not sustained by smugglers alone.
ㅤ
It requires demand.
ㅤ
And reducing that demand requires us to examine something much closer to home: our own fascination with possessing rare and exotic wildlife.
ㅤ
The most important question may not be why someone smuggled an animal.
ㅤ
It may be:
ㅤ
Why did someone want that wild animal badly enough to create a market for it in the first place?

Source: Savannah Walsh, Vanity Fair, July 29, 2026 — interview with Eric Goode regarding Monsters of God. Vanity Fair
ㅤ
Read the Complete Vanity Fair Interview:
Animal Instinct: After Tiger King and Chimp Crazy, Filmmaker Eric Goode Exposes His Own Past With the Illegal Reptile Trade
ㅤ
 When “Legal For Sale” Doesn’t Mean Legally Sourced
The pet trade puts reptiles and amphibians at risk: close legal gaps now

KeepingWildlifeWild.org
Evidence • Education • Accountability
 

How You Can Help:

Awareness is the first step toward meaningful change. Help advance evidence-based education, transparency and accountability by sharing this article with others.

Together, we can encourage a more informed conversation about the treatment and protection of wildlife.